A fortunate group of civilians gets chosen each year to participate in a Capabilities Exercise with the brave men and women in the United States Army Special Operations Command (USASOC). I was fortunate to be on this year's CAPEX list and drove with great anticipation to attend the event in Fort Bragg N.C.
USASOC oversees Special Operations Forces (SOF).
The current commander of USASOC is an amazing American patriot, Lieutenant General John F. Mulholland, Jr.
I had the opportunity to speak to Mulholland a few different times during the day. The man is humble, focused on team, a patriot, and no nonsense. His soldiers spoke about how what the man says in public is truly how the man commands.
CAPEX takes us civilians through a capabilities exercise, and at times you feel as if you are actually in the presence of the X-Men. The men and women are not just amazing athletes, they have the smarts, instincts, bravery, and resolve to conduct their missions. Being in their presence for a mere 24 hours inspires me to be more focused on life and work and to, well, just be better.
While going through our activities, I was struck at how often these brave men and women are deployed. Some go out on 8 month missions, come home for 2-4 months, and rotate back out. During the 2 months "at home", they are expected to train, do paperwork, stay certified, be "on call", and fit in time with their families.
Our day was action packed. The goal is to show us the capabilities, so as civilians, we understand how funding is used to support and build capabilities. I can tell you that when the world needs a hero, you cannot go find a unit of heroes overnight. Heroes are made over a period of time. You have to build them over years and help them perfect their trade so they can avoid the need for a hero, or, when the worst happens, you have heroes at the ready. Without fail, these men and women do not want to be recognized as heroes. If you want to laud their team, go for it, but they prefer not to be singled out.
The CAPEX methodology uses progressive unconventional warfare scenarios. They are somewhat based on inevitable or plausible future world events designed to demonstrate Army Special Operations Forces’ diverse capabilities.
I attended a lovely dinner with my new team mates at the Chris' Steak house (not Ruth's Chris, just Chris). The conversation was spirited and lively. When we talked about the injured and the fallen, and the needs for their families, even the war hardened men in the room became choked up. I was not the only one holding back the lump in the throat.
The morning came early and I got ready in my room, anticipating the day. Stretching. A few exercises to get ready. Then board the bus.
As we rode towards the exercise, they started to tell us a little about what to expect. Then our bus hit a checkpoint and we were boarded by the (exercise) enemy. The enemy wanted to indoctrinate us and make us work in socialized labor camps. We got off the bus for our indoctrination. We were told to turn off our cell phones, face the back of the person in front of us, walk in 2 lines, hands out of pockets. I saw a man talking on his phone. Suddenly his feet left the ground and there was shouting. The man was hauled away screaming for us to help him. I was yelled at to not look away from the back of the person in front of me. In my head I am thinking, "This is not right. We outnumber them. I don't care if they have guns. They are beating him." I know this an exercise and I'm wondering what part of my psychology is being tested. I asked a soldier later if I "did the right thing" going along and he told me that every situation is different. Sometimes you fight early on, sometimes you go. It just depends.
Then, we get to "come out of role" so we can be briefed by Mulholland. He asks us to do three things: 1. pray for our troops; 2. when we see them in uniform, go up and shake their hand, talk to them, thank them; and 3. support their mission space - with words and budget. The US Navy Seal instructors have a saying, "The more you sweat in training, the less you bleed in war". I wear a USMC shirt when I run that exclaims, "Pain is just weakness leaving the body". USASOC is a good example of both of those mottos.
Back in role, we are told to use the bathrooms quietly for a "comfort break" and to assemble in the hall in 2 lines. We are then treated to a demonstration by the Black Daggers. Amazing feats of mind and body over nature. Reminding me again, heroes are not created overnight.
Back on the bus we are headed to our labor camp. I'm wondering what my contribution will have to be in this labor camp. I think to myself, "Maybe I can dig a ditch and then create a secret way out. How involved will this exercise go?" But I did not have to think about it for long. Our brave troops had trained guerrilla fighters and these fighters came to rescue us and help us re-connect with our US troops for repatriation.
Since we kept running into bad guys, the exercise naturally gives us an opportunity to train with guns. I shot 5 different weapons. My trainers told me I had missed my calling, under their expert guidance, I shot all targets on first shot with two exceptions. My first shots on the Glock were low and wide. My soldier gave me some pointers and suddenly I was rocking the Glock to take down hostiles. My other challenge was on the sniper target range and a last, far away target on the Scar (Special forces Combat Assault Rifle) gave me a little trouble but after the soldier "doped the scope" and told me to aim the cross hair a little off to the right, bullseye. Heroes are not created overnight.
Once we were trained on how to man the scopes and the guns, we were ready for the next event, witnessing a hostage rescue. The soldiers smiled when I walked up to put on my flak jacket. They kept looking around and found what they announced to be "the smallest one we could find Ma'am". Then came the helmet which, by the time we fitted it on my head, the strap was quite long. We stood on top of a structure - visualize sort of a grated structure that creates a see-through roof. We watched our soldiers break into the house with amazing precision and take out the hostiles while preserving the hostage's life. I marveled at this. All soldiers are on separate legs but they they moved along, in separate rooms, in precise synchronization, it was as if they belonged to one being. Heroes are not created overnight. After all was clear, the soldiers then showed us how they are trained to create their own tools of trade, including their own explosive devices.
Then, it's off to a village. We go through a house and see how the soldiers are trained to look for digital devices, home made bomb making, and the subtleties they need to learn. You cannot just barge through homes looking for things. A digital device could be taped to back of a carpet. A tarp that is rolled up but looks a little worn might be scraped for bomb making. This takes smarts and strategic thinking, not just brawn.
We then meet up with Mulholland and other soldiers at a mess tent and a feast of MREs. I am actually quite surprised at the breadth of choices. There is a vegetarian MRE waiting for me at the table. Nice touch all y'all! I look at the caloric content on back and this one meal has more calories in it then I eat in a day! Leaving me to wonder what type of workouts I am really doing? There are instructions: eat carbs first. If you are not hungry enough to eat everything, then eat a little of everything. My feast is a veggie burger in BBQ sauce, a muffin top, applesauce, and a protein bar. I ate a little bit of the MRE and marveled at how the soldiers ate them like you and I would eat a meal at home.
Break time is over and now we head to a conflict between the bad guys and our soldiers. We are standing on roof top and watch a German shepherd pick out a man just walking along. The dog was trained to look for bomb makers. He got his man!
Then a gunfight breaks out. One of my soldiers, a 24 year old that dreamed of being part of special ops since he was 3 years old, is on the ground and in pain. I am ticked! I had just talked to this young man earlier. He is so self assured. Entered the US Army right after high school graduation. I had told him, "Your parents did something right. They must be so proud!" He said, "Ma'am, I hope you are right. Frankly, they are pi###d that I joined. Not sure they are over the shock still. I have no military in my family." He smiled, so proud to serve. This image is in my head as I walk up to my lead soldier and tell my lead soldier I want to help carry our fallen man off the field. He looks at all 60 inches of me and says, "Are you sure ma'am? He's going to be very heavy. You have to get him out of harm's way and then fight the downwind from the 3 helos to load him up." I smile and say, "I can do this." As I approach my downed soldier, the medic, and 3 men they are a little puzzled as I stand near the feet and say, "Hi there. Tell me what to do, I want to help carry him to safety." One man shouts, "Don't drop him ma'am. If you think you are going to drop him, yell so we can hear you and gently put him down." I just smile and nod. Yes, I carried him and did not drop him. We load him onto the Chinook. One of my soldiers looks at me and says, "Ma'am, you are a bad a##". I smile and buckle up into my seat. I cannot get the lap belt tight so my seat mates start a heave-ho to tighten the belt laughing as we get it tight. I notice machine gunners in the front windows and ask if we can get a chance to shoot, not allowed. I ask if we are going to get a chance to rappel out the back of the helo. Not allowed.
We fly in circles, the machine guns are buzzing. The gunners are busy. It sounds like a high pitched drill hum? Not sure how to define it. I look across the aisle and give a thumbs up to the person that was sponsoring our group. Lump back in the throat again. Great granddaughter, granddaughter, daughter and wife of men that served and the amazing women married to them, I gave thanks to God for the day's experience. My name made the list at CAPEX. A gift and a blessing. What I need to do with that gift and blessing, I am not completely sure. I will continue praying for the brave men and women that volunteer to serve and their families. I will pray for God to lead me and guide me on what to do with this amazing experience.
I am sure I am missing many details from the day, such as the demonstration of leaflets dropping to warn the village of upcoming operations. Or the focus on winning hearts and minds of the countries we are located in and helping them, help themselves. Or the focus on helping women learn how to have a safer childbirth. It's not just about might and fight, it's about men and women with hearts that fight for right.
Hooah.
This unit is truly SINE PARI - without equal.
From a leadership perspective, here are the core SOF Truths:
SOF Truths
Humans are more important than Hardware.
Quality is better than Quantity.
Special Operations Forces cannot be mass produced.
Competent Special Operations Forces cannot be created after emergencies occur.
Most Special Operations require non-SOF assistance
For more about USASOC, go to: http://www.soc.mil/UNS/Fact%20Sheets/Fact%20Sheets.html
Other Links of Interest
Contributors
Saturday, May 7, 2011
Monday, April 18, 2011
Guest Post - Michael Senatore
Fortalice® Intern: Michael Senatore
Topic: Cookies
Title
Since the creation of the internet, “cookies” have been used to monitor the activities of consumers on the web, but what exactly is the need for cookies and how do they work?
Internship Outline: #3
Version 1.0
Date: 09 April 2011
Summary
Cookies were first introduced to the internet as a method for web pages to remember a visitor. They were used to store things such as passwords, user names, or the contents of an online shopping cart after a browser leaves a certain page. So when a browser returned to a page, they would not have to re-enter their password or refill their shopping cart. Through the use of cookies, the web page would remember their previous visit and it would be like they never left the page in the first place. However, as the internet has continued to develop so have cookies. Now they are shared amongst linked web pages to help profile users and track their movements over the world wide web.
Background
Cookies are best described as a piece of text stored on a user’s computer by their web browser. When Lou Montulli, a well known web browser producer, first introduced cookies to the internet in 1994, they were originally intended to make the web browsing experience easier for the user by implementing a virtual shopping cart. With the ability of a website to remember specific visitors through cookies, the site could store and remember what the visitor was shopping for. Even after leaving the site, the user could return and pick up right where they had left off, making the internet shopping experience much more user friendly.
As cookies progressed and developed further, they began to take on new tasks, such as remembering the user names and passwords of users, making signing into websites much easier. However, as the general public became more aware of cookies throughout the late 1990’s, their downside began to surface. In 1996, cookies began to receive media attention due to their potential privacy issues. If web sites can store information about specific users, what else are they capable of keeping tabs on? And furthermore, in what other ways is this information being used?
Strategic Planning Assumptions
-For personal use, people using the internet will have to decide what is more important to them, simplicity or privacy?
-In the near future, companies will undoubtedly make their employees use an internet browser that disables cookies. For a business, not protecting a customers personal information could lead to major legal problems. This possibility can be eliminated by disabling cookies.
-If restrictions to cookies become common place on the internet, the Internet Advertising Bureau will be forced to make major changes to the way they obtain information about internet users. This could potentially alter the entire structure of internet advertising as we know it today.
Analysis
Throughout the development and advancement of cookies they have continued to take on more tasks and responsibilities. Where they were originally intended to make the web browsing experience easier, many would now question their impact on privacy. With the different types of cookies being used by web browsers on the internet today, an individual’s personal preferences are now not only being stored, but also being shared amongst different websites. For instance, third party cookies are now something that all internet users should be aware. Third party cookies have introduced the idea of behavioral targeting, by allowing different sites to share the stored information from cookies. For instance, when users are researching Barrack Obama on one site, and then they visit another site and an ad pops up selling a Barrack Obama biography, they have been the victim of a third party cookie.
The easiest way to get rid of cookies and prevent behavioral targeting is to delete the cookies currently on your personal computer. Cookies are essentially just a text file that is stored so deleting them is pretty simple. They do not have the same properties as viruses so they do not replicate themselves, however some new types of cookies do have the ability to fight against being deleted. Flash cookies for instance, have the ability to spawn new cookies once deleted without the user ever knowing. Ultimately, the most effective way to minimize cookies on your personal computer is through the settings in your internet browser. By selecting the option to “disable cookies completely,” a person can rid their personal computer of cookies. However, this also eliminates the positives of cookies, such as remembering user names and passwords.
Implications
-Enabling cookies makes surfing the web much easier and provides a more satisfying user experience. Cookies help to eliminate the process of repeatedly inputting information to websites that a user frequently visits.
-At the same time these cookies are monitoring the activities and interests of individual users. Also, personal information such as an address or phone number can be stored and shared through cookies.
-Restrictions on cookies have not gone unchallenged. The Internet Advertising Bureau, which generated ad spending of about $20.12 billion in 2010, contends that they would not survive with a prior consent rule set in place.
-Other websites such as facebook.com, google.com, and amazon.com contend that a prior consent rule would be costly and disruptive “to the detriment of website users.”
Key Findings
-Cookies are continuously being developed and altered to more effectively track the activities of individual internet users. Flash cookies make deleting cookies off your computer more difficult while third party cookies are shared amongst different advertising websites to more effectively appeal to a person’s interests.
-Currently cookies are a hot button issue. Most of the major web browsers such as Firefox and Internet Explorer are in the process of developing a regulated “do not track” tool.
-The European Union is also working on a mandate that would force web browsers to obtain consent before tracking users through cookies. This however is currently still in the court systems due to different countries interpreting the laws differently. The debate is over whether internet users should have to opt in (agree to cookies) or opt out (deny them.)
Recommendations
-Enable the “disable cookies completely” option for your web browser. Doing so will eliminate cookies from your personal computer and keep your personal information private. This will require you to repeatedly enter user names and passwords, but ultimately those extra few seconds are not as important as keeping your personal information private.
-Educate yourself with the current state of cookies. Currently the issue of cookies and internet privacy is up for debate amongst all of the major web browsers. By staying up to date you can ensure that you will not fall victim to the latest version of cookies.
-Know your web browser. Get familiar with its options and capabilities. Apple’s newest web browser, Lion, which will be released this summer will have a “do not track” privacy tool. Internet Explorer and Firefox on the other hand, are still implementing a similar option.
SOURCES
“Apple Adds Do Not Track Tool To New Browser.” Nick Wingfield. Wallstreetjournal.com. April 14, 2011
“EU Chews On Web Cookies.” Paul Sonne and John W. Miller. Wallstreetjournal.com. November 22, 2010.
“A Guide To Cookies.” Christina Tsuei. Wallstreetjournal.com. July 30, 2010.
“Cookies Cause Bitter Backlash.” Jennifer Valentino-Devries and Emily Steel. Wallstreetjournal.com. September 19, 2010.
Topic: Cookies
Title
Since the creation of the internet, “cookies” have been used to monitor the activities of consumers on the web, but what exactly is the need for cookies and how do they work?
Internship Outline: #3
Version 1.0
Date: 09 April 2011
Summary
Cookies were first introduced to the internet as a method for web pages to remember a visitor. They were used to store things such as passwords, user names, or the contents of an online shopping cart after a browser leaves a certain page. So when a browser returned to a page, they would not have to re-enter their password or refill their shopping cart. Through the use of cookies, the web page would remember their previous visit and it would be like they never left the page in the first place. However, as the internet has continued to develop so have cookies. Now they are shared amongst linked web pages to help profile users and track their movements over the world wide web.
Background
Cookies are best described as a piece of text stored on a user’s computer by their web browser. When Lou Montulli, a well known web browser producer, first introduced cookies to the internet in 1994, they were originally intended to make the web browsing experience easier for the user by implementing a virtual shopping cart. With the ability of a website to remember specific visitors through cookies, the site could store and remember what the visitor was shopping for. Even after leaving the site, the user could return and pick up right where they had left off, making the internet shopping experience much more user friendly.
As cookies progressed and developed further, they began to take on new tasks, such as remembering the user names and passwords of users, making signing into websites much easier. However, as the general public became more aware of cookies throughout the late 1990’s, their downside began to surface. In 1996, cookies began to receive media attention due to their potential privacy issues. If web sites can store information about specific users, what else are they capable of keeping tabs on? And furthermore, in what other ways is this information being used?
Strategic Planning Assumptions
-For personal use, people using the internet will have to decide what is more important to them, simplicity or privacy?
-In the near future, companies will undoubtedly make their employees use an internet browser that disables cookies. For a business, not protecting a customers personal information could lead to major legal problems. This possibility can be eliminated by disabling cookies.
-If restrictions to cookies become common place on the internet, the Internet Advertising Bureau will be forced to make major changes to the way they obtain information about internet users. This could potentially alter the entire structure of internet advertising as we know it today.
Analysis
Throughout the development and advancement of cookies they have continued to take on more tasks and responsibilities. Where they were originally intended to make the web browsing experience easier, many would now question their impact on privacy. With the different types of cookies being used by web browsers on the internet today, an individual’s personal preferences are now not only being stored, but also being shared amongst different websites. For instance, third party cookies are now something that all internet users should be aware. Third party cookies have introduced the idea of behavioral targeting, by allowing different sites to share the stored information from cookies. For instance, when users are researching Barrack Obama on one site, and then they visit another site and an ad pops up selling a Barrack Obama biography, they have been the victim of a third party cookie.
The easiest way to get rid of cookies and prevent behavioral targeting is to delete the cookies currently on your personal computer. Cookies are essentially just a text file that is stored so deleting them is pretty simple. They do not have the same properties as viruses so they do not replicate themselves, however some new types of cookies do have the ability to fight against being deleted. Flash cookies for instance, have the ability to spawn new cookies once deleted without the user ever knowing. Ultimately, the most effective way to minimize cookies on your personal computer is through the settings in your internet browser. By selecting the option to “disable cookies completely,” a person can rid their personal computer of cookies. However, this also eliminates the positives of cookies, such as remembering user names and passwords.
Implications
-Enabling cookies makes surfing the web much easier and provides a more satisfying user experience. Cookies help to eliminate the process of repeatedly inputting information to websites that a user frequently visits.
-At the same time these cookies are monitoring the activities and interests of individual users. Also, personal information such as an address or phone number can be stored and shared through cookies.
-Restrictions on cookies have not gone unchallenged. The Internet Advertising Bureau, which generated ad spending of about $20.12 billion in 2010, contends that they would not survive with a prior consent rule set in place.
-Other websites such as facebook.com, google.com, and amazon.com contend that a prior consent rule would be costly and disruptive “to the detriment of website users.”
Key Findings
-Cookies are continuously being developed and altered to more effectively track the activities of individual internet users. Flash cookies make deleting cookies off your computer more difficult while third party cookies are shared amongst different advertising websites to more effectively appeal to a person’s interests.
-Currently cookies are a hot button issue. Most of the major web browsers such as Firefox and Internet Explorer are in the process of developing a regulated “do not track” tool.
-The European Union is also working on a mandate that would force web browsers to obtain consent before tracking users through cookies. This however is currently still in the court systems due to different countries interpreting the laws differently. The debate is over whether internet users should have to opt in (agree to cookies) or opt out (deny them.)
Recommendations
-Enable the “disable cookies completely” option for your web browser. Doing so will eliminate cookies from your personal computer and keep your personal information private. This will require you to repeatedly enter user names and passwords, but ultimately those extra few seconds are not as important as keeping your personal information private.
-Educate yourself with the current state of cookies. Currently the issue of cookies and internet privacy is up for debate amongst all of the major web browsers. By staying up to date you can ensure that you will not fall victim to the latest version of cookies.
-Know your web browser. Get familiar with its options and capabilities. Apple’s newest web browser, Lion, which will be released this summer will have a “do not track” privacy tool. Internet Explorer and Firefox on the other hand, are still implementing a similar option.
SOURCES
“Apple Adds Do Not Track Tool To New Browser.” Nick Wingfield. Wallstreetjournal.com. April 14, 2011
“EU Chews On Web Cookies.” Paul Sonne and John W. Miller. Wallstreetjournal.com. November 22, 2010.
“A Guide To Cookies.” Christina Tsuei. Wallstreetjournal.com. July 30, 2010.
“Cookies Cause Bitter Backlash.” Jennifer Valentino-Devries and Emily Steel. Wallstreetjournal.com. September 19, 2010.
Guest Post - Michael Senatore
Intern: Michael Senatore
Topic: Mac OS vs. PC
TITLE
Viruses and malware infecting Apple computers are on the rise and becoming increasingly problematic, leaving many asking the question, “Are Mac’s really more secure than PC’s?”
Internship Outline: #2
Version 1.0
Date: 05 March 2011
SUMMARY
For years there has been an ongoing debate between not only Mac and PC users, but security analysts alike about which platform is more safe and secure. Up until the past few years 99.9% of people would have said hands down, it was Mac that was the safest. However over the last three to four years, the tides have changed to say the least. Many would now argue that PC’s have surpassed the Mac in terms of security. Naturally, the truth of the matter lies somewhere in the middle, as Macs are more safe but PCs are more secure. Never the less, the debate continues to rage on.
BACKGROUND
For starters I think it is necessary to establish exactly what the difference is between safety and security. Most people would think there wasn’t one; that the two go hand in hand, which actually is true. However at the same time, there is a discernible difference. The easiest way to examine the difference is to give an example. What is more secure, a Honda Accord or an Army tank? Obviously the Army tank is more secure in every way imaginable. But what is safer, a Honda Accord driving through Nowhere Town, USA or an Army tank in the midst of a battle in Afghanistan? In this instance you can forget about the security of the tank because undoubtedly the Honda Accord is the safer of the two vehicles. In both examples, the Honda is the Mac and the tank is the PC.
This issue is currently at the forefront of the internet securities field, which is why I feel it is a pertinent matter to discuss. With the current success of Apple and their products, the debate between Mac and PC continues to pick up steam. As a consumer, the ability of an operating system to protect itself is a major topic of concern. It is also one of the major selling points when a person is deciding to buy a computer. For the casual home computer, the customer wants a secure platform that will help them to avoid the constant headaches of malware and other infectious viruses.
STRATEGIC PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS
-According to Charlie Miller, a principle analyst at Independent Security Evaluators, “Technologically speaking, PCs are a little more secure than Macs. Macs have a larger attack surface out of the box. This means Macs have more vulnerabilities, and it’s easier to turn a vulnerability into an exploit on the platform. Despite the fact it is less secure, paradoxically, Macs are actually safe to use for most people.”
-Due to their insufficient security protocols compared to Microsoft, Apple products may show their vulnerability in the upcoming years.
-Where Microsoft has been lauded for their concerted efforts towards improved security, Apple is often criticized for ignoring these issues.
ANALYSIS
Thanks to the fact that Macs still lack some anti-exploitation technologies found in PCs, like full ASLR (Address Space Layout Randomizaton), they are not quite as secure. ASLR randomizes the location where system executables are loaded into memory, which prevents malware looking for certain files in specific memory locations from being able to run its exploit. This is just one example of a vulnerability of the Mac OS X, and to a hacker, vulnerabilities are almost like an invitation. Microsoft has simply done more in terms of inherent security features than Apple. Also, in the development of Internet Explorer 8, Microsoft is showing an extremely diligent commitment to security. They have brought in teams of security professionals to look at their codes, leading to a more secure product.
Furthermore, the Mac OS X has a large attack surface consisting of open source components, closed source third party components, and closed source Apple components. Viruses and bugs in any of these areas can lead to remote compromise. Charlie Miller claims, “Mac OS X is like living in a farmhouse in the country with no locks, and Windows is living in a house with bars on the windows in the bad part of town.” Once again there is a very fine line between the ultimate successes of these two operating systems when it comes to warding off security issues.
IMPLICATIONS
-57% of Mac users feel they can safely navigate the web without a need for anti virus protection.
-According to an ESET (Essential Security against Evolving Threats) survey, both Mac and PC users perceive Macs to be a more secure operating system.
-The same ESET survey showed that Mac users are victims of cyber crime just as frequently as PC.
- Although the Mac OS may be safer to use at the present time, this mentality is very problematic and will most likely fester into a bigger problem for Mac users in the next three to five years.
-If you gave a teenager a Mac for a week and a PC for a week, most likely the PC would come back with more security issues. This is an example of why the most influential contributor to this issue is the person using the computer.
KEY FINDINGS
-The bottom line is that although PC’s may be more secure, Mac’s are currently the safer platform when it comes to surfing the web.
-PC operating systems have utilized ahead of the curve technologies such as ASLR to make their platform more secure.
-PC has made a concerted effort in the fight against malware by hiring outside security consulting firms to test their codes and systems for vulnerabilities.
RECOMMENDATIONS
-The safest way to navigate the web is to play it safe and use common sense. Do not download programs and files from unknown sources.
-Stay educated on the issue of operating system security. Knowledge of the signs of unsafe internet sites will go a long way. Being able to recognize these signs is another key aspect of keeping your operating system clean.
-Keep your computer up to date with security protocols and anti virus programming. Take advantage of the updates that your operating system will provide for you.
SOURCES
“In their own words: Experts weigh in on Mac vs. PC security.” Elinor Mills. news.cnet.com. February 1, 2011.
“Mac OS X backdoor Trojan, now in beta?” Chester Wiesnewski. nakedsecurity.sophos.com. February 26, 2011.
“Mac OS X: ‘safer, but less secure.’” Dave Courbanou. h-online.com. March 18, 2010.
Topic: Mac OS vs. PC
TITLE
Viruses and malware infecting Apple computers are on the rise and becoming increasingly problematic, leaving many asking the question, “Are Mac’s really more secure than PC’s?”
Internship Outline: #2
Version 1.0
Date: 05 March 2011
SUMMARY
For years there has been an ongoing debate between not only Mac and PC users, but security analysts alike about which platform is more safe and secure. Up until the past few years 99.9% of people would have said hands down, it was Mac that was the safest. However over the last three to four years, the tides have changed to say the least. Many would now argue that PC’s have surpassed the Mac in terms of security. Naturally, the truth of the matter lies somewhere in the middle, as Macs are more safe but PCs are more secure. Never the less, the debate continues to rage on.
BACKGROUND
For starters I think it is necessary to establish exactly what the difference is between safety and security. Most people would think there wasn’t one; that the two go hand in hand, which actually is true. However at the same time, there is a discernible difference. The easiest way to examine the difference is to give an example. What is more secure, a Honda Accord or an Army tank? Obviously the Army tank is more secure in every way imaginable. But what is safer, a Honda Accord driving through Nowhere Town, USA or an Army tank in the midst of a battle in Afghanistan? In this instance you can forget about the security of the tank because undoubtedly the Honda Accord is the safer of the two vehicles. In both examples, the Honda is the Mac and the tank is the PC.
This issue is currently at the forefront of the internet securities field, which is why I feel it is a pertinent matter to discuss. With the current success of Apple and their products, the debate between Mac and PC continues to pick up steam. As a consumer, the ability of an operating system to protect itself is a major topic of concern. It is also one of the major selling points when a person is deciding to buy a computer. For the casual home computer, the customer wants a secure platform that will help them to avoid the constant headaches of malware and other infectious viruses.
STRATEGIC PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS
-According to Charlie Miller, a principle analyst at Independent Security Evaluators, “Technologically speaking, PCs are a little more secure than Macs. Macs have a larger attack surface out of the box. This means Macs have more vulnerabilities, and it’s easier to turn a vulnerability into an exploit on the platform. Despite the fact it is less secure, paradoxically, Macs are actually safe to use for most people.”
-Due to their insufficient security protocols compared to Microsoft, Apple products may show their vulnerability in the upcoming years.
-Where Microsoft has been lauded for their concerted efforts towards improved security, Apple is often criticized for ignoring these issues.
ANALYSIS
Thanks to the fact that Macs still lack some anti-exploitation technologies found in PCs, like full ASLR (Address Space Layout Randomizaton), they are not quite as secure. ASLR randomizes the location where system executables are loaded into memory, which prevents malware looking for certain files in specific memory locations from being able to run its exploit. This is just one example of a vulnerability of the Mac OS X, and to a hacker, vulnerabilities are almost like an invitation. Microsoft has simply done more in terms of inherent security features than Apple. Also, in the development of Internet Explorer 8, Microsoft is showing an extremely diligent commitment to security. They have brought in teams of security professionals to look at their codes, leading to a more secure product.
Furthermore, the Mac OS X has a large attack surface consisting of open source components, closed source third party components, and closed source Apple components. Viruses and bugs in any of these areas can lead to remote compromise. Charlie Miller claims, “Mac OS X is like living in a farmhouse in the country with no locks, and Windows is living in a house with bars on the windows in the bad part of town.” Once again there is a very fine line between the ultimate successes of these two operating systems when it comes to warding off security issues.
IMPLICATIONS
-57% of Mac users feel they can safely navigate the web without a need for anti virus protection.
-According to an ESET (Essential Security against Evolving Threats) survey, both Mac and PC users perceive Macs to be a more secure operating system.
-The same ESET survey showed that Mac users are victims of cyber crime just as frequently as PC.
- Although the Mac OS may be safer to use at the present time, this mentality is very problematic and will most likely fester into a bigger problem for Mac users in the next three to five years.
-If you gave a teenager a Mac for a week and a PC for a week, most likely the PC would come back with more security issues. This is an example of why the most influential contributor to this issue is the person using the computer.
KEY FINDINGS
-The bottom line is that although PC’s may be more secure, Mac’s are currently the safer platform when it comes to surfing the web.
-PC operating systems have utilized ahead of the curve technologies such as ASLR to make their platform more secure.
-PC has made a concerted effort in the fight against malware by hiring outside security consulting firms to test their codes and systems for vulnerabilities.
RECOMMENDATIONS
-The safest way to navigate the web is to play it safe and use common sense. Do not download programs and files from unknown sources.
-Stay educated on the issue of operating system security. Knowledge of the signs of unsafe internet sites will go a long way. Being able to recognize these signs is another key aspect of keeping your operating system clean.
-Keep your computer up to date with security protocols and anti virus programming. Take advantage of the updates that your operating system will provide for you.
SOURCES
“In their own words: Experts weigh in on Mac vs. PC security.” Elinor Mills. news.cnet.com. February 1, 2011.
“Mac OS X backdoor Trojan, now in beta?” Chester Wiesnewski. nakedsecurity.sophos.com. February 26, 2011.
“Mac OS X: ‘safer, but less secure.’” Dave Courbanou. h-online.com. March 18, 2010.
Guest Post - Intern Stephanie Graziano
Intern: Stephanie Graziano
Topic: Identity Theft
Internship Outline #3
Version 1.0
Date: 8 April 2011
SUMMARY PARAGRAPH:
• Identity theft occurs when someone uses your own identifying information as their own. They can use a social security number or a credit card number without your permission to commit a crime or fraud. The FTC (Federal Trade Commission) estimates that approximately 9 million Americans have their identify stolen each year.
BACKGROUND
I myself was a victim of identity theft last summer. I received a strange letter in the mail from a local banking chain, that I had no affiliation with, telling me that I was overdue on payments. I spoke with my Dad about the letter and we decided we needed to look into this letter further. After speaking with a bank representative the next day, I found out that someone living two hours north of me in Connecticut used my social security number to withdraw a loan from the bank. I proceeded to go online and check my credit statements to see what actions had been taken. I used the three credit report companies, Equifax, Experian and Transunion. When I printed out the credit statements there was about fifty pages worth of actions under my social security number that in fact were not mine, and a total debt of $76,000. The most shocking of all the actions was where it said I took out a $40,000 college loan… I was 8 years old at the time the loan was taken. It took about two months, working with my father and our local police department, to restore my credit statements to the way they should be.
I feel that it is important for every person to keep updated on their own personal credit check. If I had not caught this issue last summer, I would have had a very hard time applying for jobs after graduating or even taking out a loan if needed. I now receive weekly emails from Experian, Equifax and Transunion making me aware if there have been any strange actions in my accounts.
STRATEGIC PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS:
• Creating accounts with the three leading credit check companies to receive annual credit reports and records. (Equifax, Transunion and Experian)
• When hiring, do elaborate backgrounds checks on possible employees.
• When at work, companies should not allow employees to explore Internet sites which are not affiliated with the company tasks. Limit Internet access to restrain employees from getting into trouble.
ANALYSIS:
Identity thieves can take another person’s information and rent apartments, open credit cards and establish telephone records under the victim’s name. Some victims can resolve their identity theft quickly, while other can spends up to two years, as well as hundreds of dollars, clearing their records. Many victims of identity theft may lose out on job opportunities, or be denied loans for education, housing or cars because of fraudulent charges on their credit reports. In rare cases, victims even are arrested for crimes they did not commit.
It has been researched that young people are more vulnerable to identity theft because they are online more, share more information often and are less careful with their information. For example, college students living in school housing such as dorm rooms and apartments may be at fault for leaving their information vulnerable without knowledge. Their information and personal belongings make be unsecured and an easy target.
IMPLICATIONS:
• Financial histories and credit records can suffer from identity theft. 85% of Identity theft victims report loss or misuse of one or more accounts.
• The amount of time and money needed to re-establish identity, credit and clear your name.
• Businesses, particularly in credit and financial fields, also suffer financial losses from ID theft. A business can suffer from lost time and productivity when the victim is an employee.
• Re-establishing a legal identity, including social security number, passport, tax records and even military records.
• Once your identity is out on the “black market” you are more vulnerable to following attacks.
KEY FINDINGS
• Stealing someone's identity to acquire -- and use -- new credit cards has become one of the most popular white-collar crimes today, according to fraud investigators from across the country.
• This year alone more than 500,000 Americans will be robbed of their identities...with more than $4 billion stolen in their names.
• Experts report that a victim can spend anywhere from six months to two years recovering from identity theft.
• Most people don't find out they have been a victim of a stolen identity until they are turned down for a loan or credit card. A copy of their credit report explaining the denial may unveil weeks or months of fraud.
RECOMMENDATIONS
• When setting up Internet accounts, be sure to create “strong” passwords with more characters (combinations of letters, numbers, special symbols, upper and lower cases). It will help protect your information if you create a password that is hard for others to know.
• Always ensure that the URL of the site you are using is the correct URL. If you are ever not sure of the exact URL, type it into Google and then enter the site with the link from Google. This will help ensure that you do not enter a hacker’s site.
• Never enter any financial information or other sensitive information into any website that does not use the secure “https” protocol (note the “s” added to “http”). When buying over the Internet with a credit card or otherwise, if a site does not use https, do not use it.
SOURCES:
“PROTECT YOUR PRIVACY”. By: MOGULL, RICH, ROTHMAN, MIKE, Macworld. April 2011
“ID Theft Red Flags” By: Lankford, Kimberly. July 2010
http://www.identitytheftprotection.org/
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/idtheft/consumers/about-identity-theft.html
Topic: Identity Theft
It’s strange to think that there could be another you in this world, but in today’s world it’s not impossible.
The FTC (Federal Trade Commission) estimates that approximately 9 million Americans have their identify stolen each year.
Internship Outline #3
Version 1.0
Date: 8 April 2011
SUMMARY PARAGRAPH:
• Identity theft occurs when someone uses your own identifying information as their own. They can use a social security number or a credit card number without your permission to commit a crime or fraud. The FTC (Federal Trade Commission) estimates that approximately 9 million Americans have their identify stolen each year.
BACKGROUND
I myself was a victim of identity theft last summer. I received a strange letter in the mail from a local banking chain, that I had no affiliation with, telling me that I was overdue on payments. I spoke with my Dad about the letter and we decided we needed to look into this letter further. After speaking with a bank representative the next day, I found out that someone living two hours north of me in Connecticut used my social security number to withdraw a loan from the bank. I proceeded to go online and check my credit statements to see what actions had been taken. I used the three credit report companies, Equifax, Experian and Transunion. When I printed out the credit statements there was about fifty pages worth of actions under my social security number that in fact were not mine, and a total debt of $76,000. The most shocking of all the actions was where it said I took out a $40,000 college loan… I was 8 years old at the time the loan was taken. It took about two months, working with my father and our local police department, to restore my credit statements to the way they should be.
I feel that it is important for every person to keep updated on their own personal credit check. If I had not caught this issue last summer, I would have had a very hard time applying for jobs after graduating or even taking out a loan if needed. I now receive weekly emails from Experian, Equifax and Transunion making me aware if there have been any strange actions in my accounts.
STRATEGIC PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS:
• Creating accounts with the three leading credit check companies to receive annual credit reports and records. (Equifax, Transunion and Experian)
• When hiring, do elaborate backgrounds checks on possible employees.
• When at work, companies should not allow employees to explore Internet sites which are not affiliated with the company tasks. Limit Internet access to restrain employees from getting into trouble.
ANALYSIS:
Identity thieves can take another person’s information and rent apartments, open credit cards and establish telephone records under the victim’s name. Some victims can resolve their identity theft quickly, while other can spends up to two years, as well as hundreds of dollars, clearing their records. Many victims of identity theft may lose out on job opportunities, or be denied loans for education, housing or cars because of fraudulent charges on their credit reports. In rare cases, victims even are arrested for crimes they did not commit.
It has been researched that young people are more vulnerable to identity theft because they are online more, share more information often and are less careful with their information. For example, college students living in school housing such as dorm rooms and apartments may be at fault for leaving their information vulnerable without knowledge. Their information and personal belongings make be unsecured and an easy target.
IMPLICATIONS:
• Financial histories and credit records can suffer from identity theft. 85% of Identity theft victims report loss or misuse of one or more accounts.
• The amount of time and money needed to re-establish identity, credit and clear your name.
• Businesses, particularly in credit and financial fields, also suffer financial losses from ID theft. A business can suffer from lost time and productivity when the victim is an employee.
• Re-establishing a legal identity, including social security number, passport, tax records and even military records.
• Once your identity is out on the “black market” you are more vulnerable to following attacks.
KEY FINDINGS
• Stealing someone's identity to acquire -- and use -- new credit cards has become one of the most popular white-collar crimes today, according to fraud investigators from across the country.
• This year alone more than 500,000 Americans will be robbed of their identities...with more than $4 billion stolen in their names.
• Experts report that a victim can spend anywhere from six months to two years recovering from identity theft.
• Most people don't find out they have been a victim of a stolen identity until they are turned down for a loan or credit card. A copy of their credit report explaining the denial may unveil weeks or months of fraud.
RECOMMENDATIONS
• When setting up Internet accounts, be sure to create “strong” passwords with more characters (combinations of letters, numbers, special symbols, upper and lower cases). It will help protect your information if you create a password that is hard for others to know.
• Always ensure that the URL of the site you are using is the correct URL. If you are ever not sure of the exact URL, type it into Google and then enter the site with the link from Google. This will help ensure that you do not enter a hacker’s site.
• Never enter any financial information or other sensitive information into any website that does not use the secure “https” protocol (note the “s” added to “http”). When buying over the Internet with a credit card or otherwise, if a site does not use https, do not use it.
SOURCES:
“PROTECT YOUR PRIVACY”. By: MOGULL, RICH, ROTHMAN, MIKE, Macworld. April 2011
“ID Theft Red Flags” By: Lankford, Kimberly. July 2010
http://www.identitytheftprotection.org/
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/idtheft/consumers/about-identity-theft.html
Friday, March 18, 2011
Guest Post - Intern Stephanie Graziano
Intern: Stephanie Graziano
Topic: Teens and young adults- implication from social networking
In a world where people have become so consumed and adapted to social networking on a daily basis, it is overlooked that a person’s shared information on these sites can be used in ways to hurt or ruin their lives, and there’s no taking it back.
Internship Outline #1
Version 1.0
Date: 3 March 2011
SUMMARY PARAGRAPH:
· Social Networking has become a large trend for teenagers and young adults. With these sites becoming more popular by the day, it is important to raise awareness to the sites users about the consequences that can come from sharing too much personal information with others. Each user needs to be careful about what he or she posts on their site profiles, and they need to know how to properly protect their privacy and security.
BACKGROUND
The sites, Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and many others have morphed themselves into every teenager and young adult’s daily routine, and not always to better his or her lifestyle. Sites like these that encourage its users to upload photos and videos and share personal information with their friends and family. The problem with these applications is that this information is not always used in a positive manner. Teenagers and young adults don’t understand the consequences that come from posting personal information and how their posts can increase exposure to people that sometimes have less than friendly intentions. Social networking users need to be educated on how to better protect their security and privacy while using these sites.
The phrase that became a nightly question in everyone’s household, “It’s 10 p.m. do you know where your children are?” has now been revolutionized thanks to social networking sites. The phrase should start including the question as to whether parents know what their children doing and exactly who are their children are talking with online. Today, parents feel inferior to the Internet because it holds so much power, and with kids starting to use the Internet at such a young age, some as young as five and six, parents feel less confident in knowing what’s available on the Internet. It is becoming more important everyday to educate parents of young teens and adults of the serious consequences that come from being an active member of social networking sites.
STRATEGIC PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS:
· Parents should stay educated about these different social networking sites that attract their children to the computer every day.
· School systems around the country should educate their students as well as their public about the risks and consequences that come from sharing too much information on social networking sites.
· School systems should hold classes or conferences for their students to better help them in providing safer profiles on their preferred site.
ANALYSIS:
Education seems to be one of the leading ways to reduce the implications that come from teenagers and young adults using social networking without understanding the consequences. If school systems and parents focused on this issue with their teenagers, these sites could be considered much safer. Social networking has picked up within the last few years and it has certainly become a part of our nation’s everyday life with smart phones enabling these sites to be at our finger tips. With users not fully understanding how sharing too much on their profiles could affect their future, we need to be educated on the proper ways to display our information.
In the article titled, “Police detective warns about dark side of the Internet,” Detective Rebekah Lynch stated that “Over 90 percent of American teens use the Internet and 75 percent of them have cell phones. There are social networking sites such as Facebook, chat rooms, e-mail, blogs, file sharing and gaming. Predators use all these to contact and connect with your kids. The Internet is the most efficient tool ever designed for sex predators.” Lynch explained that a predator can be anyone they choose to be online, anyone that may seem appealing to others, and users may never the truth. This is a valid point that social networking users may not be contacting who they think they are. A younger user can come into contact with a stranger via social networking and that person can seem friendly and kind; but on the other side of the networking site, that younger user could be chatting with a sex offender. Lynch went on to discuss that it is vital for parents to educate the children about the dangers of social networking, and to stress to never give out information such as a telephone number or address.
IMPLICATIONS:
· Those who talked to people they didn’t know were significantly more likely to be aged 16-24 (22% of those with a social networking page or profile) than 25-34 (7% of those with a profile).
· 17% of adult users said they talked to people on social networking sites that they didn’t know and 35% spoke to people who were “friends of friends”
· Having too many Facebook 'friends' and access to different social capital disrupt the sharing process due to experiences of social surveillance and social control. This social control often forces younger people in particular to use conformity as a strategy when sharing content to maintain their privacy.
· Younger and older adults display completely open public profiles without realizing it.
KEY FINDINGS
· Taking the statistic that states that 17% of adult users of social networking don’t know other uses who they keep in contact with, I find it interesting that after the news that has been reported about the risks social networking opens, users still find it not harmful to stay in touch with strangers through the internet (On Guard Online).
· On Guard Online states in their article that 22% of 16-24 year olds using social networking do not know who they are sharing their information with. It is that exact age range that is most at risk for facing invasion of privacy from strangers. This age group needs the education about the dangerous side effects of sharing too much.
· The article, “Too Many Facebook 'Friends'? Content Sharing and Sociability Versus the Need for Privacy in Social Network Sites,” states many social networking users display completely open profiles and do not realize it. This is an important example of why users need to fully understand what they are signing up for. Their profiles could hold information about their personal lives which may not be beneficial to have others know.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1) More advanced privacy settings.
a) Using the site Facebook as an example, as of right now each user is offered to change their privacy settings to how they see fit. Meaning they can set up their profile to each one of their friends in a different way. One friend may be able to view photos, but another may only be able to view their hobbies. If Facebook were to encourage young users to have their profiles be overseen by their parents, then it may be possible for Facebook to allow anyone who is under the age of 18 to only access their Facebook profile, through their parents own profile; that way, teenagers cannot post anything on their pages without their parents’ consent or without them knowing.
2) Help inform teenagers and young adults of the consequences that come from posting personal information and photos.
a) Before signing up to create a profile, each user should be educated on the site about the risks they are taking if they post too much information about themselves. Educate the users on how to safely share their information, before they create their profile.
SOURCES:
1. On Guard Online, Quick Facts, September 2007
2. WkiDot, Social Media Statistics
3. Ebsco Host, “Too Many Facebook 'Friends'? Content Sharing and Sociability Versus the Need for Privacy in Social Network Sites” [International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction]
Authors: Brandtzæg, Petter, Luders, Marika, Skjetne, Jan Håvard
4. “Police detective warns about dark side of the Internet”
Author: Nikki Patrick_morningsun.net
.
Friday, February 25, 2011
Apple and Viruses. Guest Post by Spring Intern - Michael Senatore
Intern: Michael Senatore
Topic: Apple and Viruses
Internship Outline #1
Version 1.0
Date: 25 February 2011
TEASER / TITLE
For years, Apple products have had one up on the PC regarding viruses and malware. However, due to increased market share, that time may be coming to an end.
SUMMARY PARAGRAPH
Throughout the history of Apple products there has been a long standing consumer myth that they are incapable of becoming infected with viruses. Most believe that the Mac Operating System was simply more secure than that of PC. Although the system may be more secure, it is still vulnerable to malware and other infections. One needs to look no further than the fact that Apple sells anti-virus software from many of the leading names in the virus protection industry. What really gave Apple its edge was their lack of market penetration, a result of occupying a small portion of the computer sales industry. Simply put, if you want to catch a fish, you go to the pond with the most fish. That “pond” has always been PC’s. However, along with their growing popularity and rise in market share, Apple products are becoming more vulnerable to viruses and other harmful infections.
BACKGROUND
The myth that Apple products are impervious to viruses is almost like a virus in and of itself. Only instead of infecting Apple products, it is infecting the way Apple users think about the product. This “myth” continues to mislead Apple users into believing they are safe from viruses and there is no need for anti-virus programming. Unfortunately, life would just be too simple if this was the case. From reading forums and discussing the topic with owners of Apple products, it is blatantly obvious that Apple users are completely unaware of the harm to which they are exposing their computers.
Currently there are several types of viruses that can potentially harm Apple products. One of the main areas of concern is downloading files that are infected with Trojan horses, spyware, and worms. These types of files can be found on pirated software and games. Versions of Microsoft Office infected with viruses can also infect Mac products using the program. Also, browser plug-ins for viewing video content can harbor malware, making your Mac more vulnerable to other infections. These problems are really just the beginning because they do not take into account the growth and success of Apple and their products.
STRATEGIC PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS
-Apple, the company, must do a better job of informing their customers of the risk to their computers. What was once a selling point, needs to now be addressed as a concern.
-Apple users need to become more educated. They need to open their eyes to the problem and take appropriate action.
-Acquire an anti-virus program. Many of the major anti-virus companies, such as McAfee, Intego, Norton and Symantec have all released programs for Apple products.
ANALYSIS
The main reason for the recent increase in viruses infecting Apple products goes hand in hand with the success of the company. In just the past two years, Apple has consumed nearly 3% of the entire computer sales in the United States, raising their overall market share to 10.4%. Although that may not sound like a large increase, Apple’s annual growth is nearly off the charts. Over those same two years, Apple’s year to year growth has been 24.1%, which dwarfs the overall industry’s growth of 3.8%. With the wild popularity of the iPad, iPhone and other Apple products, this percentage will only continue to grow.
In any business venture, success has its drawbacks, and this same theory can be applied to Apple and their current surge in the United States computer sales industry. As stated previously, the idea that Apple products were incapable of being infected with viruses was a selling point. Many businesses opted to use Apple computers for their convenience and savings that go along with not having to worry about viruses or spend more money on anti-virus programming. While Apple products once enjoyed the safety of their own anonymity, they must now accept what comes along with their new found popularity.
IMPLICATIONS
-The “myth” of Apple products not being able to contract viruses is simply not true.
-Apple has become a mainstay of the computer industry, holding a market share of nearly 11%, a figure which continues to rise. As a result of the increased penetration, the most secure days of the Mac OS are in the past.
-The vulnerability of Apple products goes hand in hand with the success of the company, which is growing at a rate nearly eight times that of the rest of the computer industry.
-While the sales figures of HP and Dell have plateaued, Apple continues to grow at an annual growth rate of 24.1%.
-Apple currently holds the number four ranking in the computer sales industry, behind HP, Dell, and Acer. Following market trends, by this time next year, Apple will be well ahead of Acer and catching up to HP and Dell.
-Due to the wild success of the iPad, iPhone and the Mac OS, there are no signs of Apple’s growth slowing down.
KEY FINDINGS
-The majority of Apple users are completely unaware of the susceptibility of their computers when it comes to malware. Stay informed with updates from Apple and other security upgrades.
-The easiest way to prevent computers from being infected with viruses is to stop them before they start. We all know how difficult computers can be to work with when they are infected with any type of virus.
-Nearly all the major anti-virus companies now sell programs for Apple products. (A sign of things to come?)
RECOMMENDATIONS
-Verify that your computer is protected by an anti-virus program. There are some free anti-virus programs available, such as iAntiVirus and ClamXav, however they are not considered as robust as the major companies such as McAfee, Intego, Norton and Symantec.
-Use common sense when surfing the web. Do not visit websites that are not known to be secure and do not download files or documents from an unknown sender. Also make sure your virus scanner and security updates are frequently updated with the newest protection.
-Stay ahead of the curve by educating yourself with the current viruses and other problems infecting computers.
-Happy surfing!
SOURCES
“Do Apple Computers Need Virus Protection”. Robin Noelle. eHow.com. April 1, 2010.
“Apple’s Share of Computer Sales Surpasses 10% in the U.S.”. Eric Slivka. Macrumors.com. October 13, 2010.
“Hey Apple, About This Virus Thing”. Steven Hodson. WinExtra.com. April 27, 2010.
“Antivirus Software On Your Mac: Yes or No?”. David Greenbaum. Gigaom.com. February 4, 2011.
Friday, January 28, 2011
Egypt Protests and Social Networking Site Access Impacted
Scanning Twitter feeds this week, I saw several posts that talked about what was going on Egypt with the caveat that they were posting for someone in Egypt. This is because the government of Egypt allegedy blocked Facebook and Twitter after a series of anti-government protests. Facebook was aware of disruptions in service but said it did not experience a major change in traffic.
In the CNET News article the had a quote from Jim Cowie from the internet monitoring firm, Renesys: "at approximately 2:34pm PST, his company 'observed the virtually simultaneous withdrawal of all routes to Egyptian networks in the internet's global routing table'. "
@Scobleizer posted: Egypt "Let's turn off the one thing keeping young people inside so they will stop protesting." Um, yeah, that really will work.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called on Egypt to unblock social networking sites, she asked them "not to prevent peaceful protests or block communications, including on social media".
Sources:
"US Tells Egypt to unblock Facebook, Twitter", TodayOnline, January 28, 2011.
"Twitter Reacts To Protests In Egypt", Liz McLellan, Huffington Post, January 28, 2011.
"Egypt internet outages hit Facebook and Twitter", Elinor Mills, CNET News, January 28, 2011.
In the CNET News article the had a quote from Jim Cowie from the internet monitoring firm, Renesys: "at approximately 2:34pm PST, his company 'observed the virtually simultaneous withdrawal of all routes to Egyptian networks in the internet's global routing table'. "
@Scobleizer posted: Egypt "Let's turn off the one thing keeping young people inside so they will stop protesting." Um, yeah, that really will work.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called on Egypt to unblock social networking sites, she asked them "not to prevent peaceful protests or block communications, including on social media".
Sources:
"US Tells Egypt to unblock Facebook, Twitter", TodayOnline, January 28, 2011.
"Twitter Reacts To Protests In Egypt", Liz McLellan, Huffington Post, January 28, 2011.
"Egypt internet outages hit Facebook and Twitter", Elinor Mills, CNET News, January 28, 2011.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
